Call Us: +07 554 332 322

Mon - Fri 09:00 - 19:00

Sat and Sun - CLOSED


Editorial rejection: “you aren’t citing articles of Statistical Papers”

Editorial rejection: “you aren’t citing articles of Statistical Papers”

The log Statistical Papers, with editorial workplace at the University of Dortmund rejects all manuscript submissions in the event that writers don’t cite papers using this Springer-published log. The editors claim it is maybe maybe not about effect element rigging.

Every once in awhile, experts publishing their work with book encounter a request from editors to cite some random early in the day documents from exact same log. Why? One explanation: it increases the effect element. In reality, for several journals it really is perhaps the unofficial guideline that such journal-self-citations are required, or your paper is going to be refused. Some experts abide ahead of time, to produce editors delighted. Most other people challenge with the idea that they find unethical. The German editor regarding the Springer journal Statistical Papers will explain for you right right here why here is the scientifically proper and way that is perfectly objective run a log.

A conversation grew up on Twitter recently, for the duration of which neither the log perhaps not the editor ended up being known as.

Mark Hayter, teacher of medical at University of Hull in British and a log editor himself, tweeted:

“A PhD student of mine possessed a paper accepted – one condition of acceptance ended up being that she ratings her sources and includes any appropriate present documents through the journal that is accepting”

Then he included the log was predatory that is“Not. Distinguished journal, person in COPE and from a sizable,international publishing house” and in addition specified that “They asked her to examine her references and can include ‘recent, relevant’ documents through the accepting Journal. No papers that are specific suggested“. Ended up, Hayter had not been alone with that experience:

A reviewer ( maybe perhaps perhaps not editor) when told me personally to include citations from that log within my modification. a journal that is top. Very strange. I obtained in the habit of including a few cites that are journal wherever I’m submitting and very nearly forget to give some thought to the ethics. This will be waking me up.

More anecdotes arrived, like that one through the part of medication:

Certainly, a method to falsely impact that is inflate.

There was clearly another cardiology that is international historically that insisted you cite their ethics declaration (posted being a paper).

It had been cited a great deal, their impact relocated from circa 2 to over 6 in 36 months. #gaming #unethical

All the replies had been critical, similar to this advice through the Hindawi research integrity supervisor Matt Hodgkinson:

For several we understand, the writers may have valued the Twitter outrage after which simply did exactly exactly just what the editor said and quoted some random documents from the log. Why making enemies, in place of making documents? Some experts revealed also understanding when it comes to policy:

I’ve blended feelings concerning this. One argument is you are targeting a community of scholars if you choose a particular journal. Its rational to test whatever they have previously stated regarding the subject additionally the rational location to begin may be the journal you’ve selected.

Now Professor Stephen John Senn of Luxembourg Institute of wellness is a statistician, he will clearly concur that the policy that is following of journal Statistical Papers is okay since it is. After all, if the tasks are printed in the type of a paper and it is about data, you sure must cite something using this journal that is particularly significant exactly just exactly what using the title, “Statistical Papers“, right?

This is the e-mail a reader forwarded in my opinion, a recently gotten answer their refused manuscript distribution:

Dear …., your paper has many merits. Nevertheless, provided the enormous quantity of submissions we have been receiving recently we now have chose to give attention to documents that are pertaining to work that is previous inside our log. And also this will not appear to be the full instance together with your paper because you aren’t citing articles of Statistical Papers. Furthermore, the guide list is certainly not of good quality: often all pages and posts for the log articles are missing.Thank you for providing us the chance to think about your work.Yours sincerelyChristine H. MьllerEditor-in-Chief, Statistical Papers

The EiC was contacted by me Christine Mьller, teacher of data in engineering during the Technical University of Dortmund (TU Dortmund) in Germany. She responded, confirming the e-mail authenticity:

“Due to your amount that is high of, we need to set strict criteria, and two of these would be the quality associated with the paper as well as the relationship with other documents of our log. In the event that quality is okay and just Statistical Papers isn’t cited then we often request a resubmission. Nonetheless, right right here the product quality, indicated by the guide list, appears to be dubious.”

I happened to be unconvinced this training had nothing at all to do with the Journal effect Factor (presently at 1.345 for Statistical documents) and in addition puzzled the way the editors could judge a manuscript entirely on such basis as its reference formatting (“page numbers missing”). Mьller then clarified:

“we want to be sure that submissions fit into the log and an indicator that is good frequently how good its attached to past work with our log. Note as you may see from checking our published articles (the self-citation rate of SP is not higher than that of comparable journals and you may be aware that anyway only cites of within 3 years affect the IF) that we generally do not judge that solely by whether another SP-paper is cited or not. Needless to say the caliber of a paper just isn’t judged because of the guide formatting. Nonetheless, we’ve the experience that the sloppy guide list is an indicator of a sloppy written paper. We believe that editors of other journals has the experience that is same can certainly make comparable conclusions. Ergo the remark in the guide part ended up being meant as an ongoing solution into the writer.”

That e-mail ended up being finalized by Christine Mьller together with other two primary editors, Carsten Jentsch, teacher of data in economics at exact exact same TU Dortmund, and Werner Mьller, professor at Institute for Applied Statistics at University of Linz, Austria.

The journal’s writers seem to comply with these unofficial editorial guidelines. We viewed the very first 3 recently posted studies in Statistical Papers (all incidentally from Asia), one recommendations 4 documents here, another recommendations 2, 3rd recommendations 1 paper in exact exact same log. But is the range of Statistical Papers really that slim? This is exactly what the log internet site states in this respect:

“Statistical Papers offers a forum for the presentation and assessment that is critical of techniques. In specific, the log encourages the conversation of methodological fundamentals along with possible applications.

This journal stresses statistical techniques which have broad applications; nevertheless, it will provide attention that is special analytical techniques which are highly relevant to the financial and social sciences. As well as research that is original, visitors will discover study articles, quick notes, reports on analytical pc pc pc software, issue part, and book reviews”

Nowhere it’s mentioned that the submissions must cite some random papers that are past exact exact same log to suit the range. The assigned publisher administrator from Springer decided to go with never to respond to my e-mails, and exactly why as long as they. The editors do their utmost to improve the journal’s citation index.

But also for argument’s sake, if Statistical Papers is a unique field that is separate, certainly the Editor-in-Chief are expert for the certain technology section of “Statistical Papers”? Regrettably, she actually is not necessarily. an extended variety of magazines is published by Christine Mьller on the TU Dortmund web site, from 1984 till now, presumably her whole research production, since perhaps maybe not otherwise specified. Yet just two of Mьller’s papers that are statistical inside her log Statistical Papers, that will be posted since 1960 (until 1995, even yet in German). Her namesake editor colleague Werner Mьller has also just two documents in this log to exhibit, while Jentsch will not record a solitary book in Statistical Papers on their internet site.

Essentially, they truly are industry outsiders for the niche that is obscure technology of Statistical Papers, having scarcely (or perhaps not at all) published here on their own. Or even their very own journal’s impact element is simply too low and requirements boosting before Mьller, Mьller & Jentsch contemplate it as being a place?

In the event that you had comparable experiences with editors imposing citation that is own-journal, please contemplate sharing these below into the comment area.